Writing a discussion section for a research paper
A Sociology Writer's Guide.
Example of discussion in research paper pdf
However, based on the findings of similar studies, a more plausible explanation is Y. Be wary of mistaking the reiteration of a specific finding for an interpretation. The aim of the experiment was to determine if dietary intervention with low- or high-cholesterol diets could affect cholesterol levels in middle-aged subjects. However during this process your outcomes should be revealed fully, and roughly the message of the manuscript which be delivered. In this way you relate your own results to the store of scientific knowledge. Consider Alternative Explanations of the Findings It is important to remember that the purpose of research is to discover and not to prove. Remember that the data are the data: nothing more, nothing less.
A few historical references may be helpful for perspective, but most of the references should be relatively recent and included to aid in the interpretation of your results or used to link to similar studies.
NOTE: Besides the literature review section, the preponderance of references to sources in your research paper are usually found in the discussion section.
The order of interpreting each major finding should be in the same order as they were described in your results section. Similarly, over the same period, consumption of a low cholesterol diet did not significantly reduce plasma cholesterol concentration.
Make Suggestions for Further Research You may choose to conclude the discussion section by making suggestions for further research [this can be done in the overall conclusion of your paper].
Psychology report discussion example
A Sociology Writer's Guide. The introductory paragraph starts with an undebatable sentence, and proceeds with a part addressing the following questions as 1 On what issue we have to concentrate, discuss or elaborate? Comments coming from the reviewers should be criticized, but a defensive attitude should not be assumed during this evaluation process. If you encountered problems when gathering or analyzing data, describe these and explain how they influenced the results. Deduction: a claim for how the results can be applied more generally. Avoid using an apologetic tone; however, be honest and self-critical [e. The aim of the experiment was to determine if dietary intervention with low- or high-cholesterol diets could affect cholesterol levels in middle-aged subjects. Systematically explain the underlying meaning of your findings and state why you believe they are significant.
Use of the first person pronoun is generally acceptable. Note that any significant or unanticipated finding is often because there was no prior research to indicate the finding could occur. Remember that the data are the data: nothing more, nothing less.
Our approach on this subject is to write all structured parts of the manuscript at the same time, and start writing the manuscript while reading the first literature.
How to write discussion in thesis ppt
One of the most common mistakes that you can make when discussing the results of your study is to present a superficial interpretation of the findings that more or less re-states the results section of your paper. MacCoun, Robert J. How valid and accurate are your results? Even then, any conclusions pertaining to the influence of dietary cholesterol on plasma cholesterol concentrations would be limited to Caucasian, middle-aged omnivores. Abstract Writing manuscripts to describe study outcomes, although not easy, is the main task of an academician. A good discussion section includes analysis of any unexpected findings. In addition, a pre-peer review process is recommended to obtain feedback on the manuscript. Previously, similar articles might have been published, however innovative messages, and new perspectives on the relevant subject will facilitate acceptance of the article for publication. Recommendations for further research can be included in either the discussion or conclusion of your paper, but do not repeat your recommendations in the both sections.
Achievement of the shared duties within a predetermined time frame will sustain the motivation of the researchers, and prevent wearing out of updated data.
How to Write an Effective Discussion. Should you need to remind the reader of the finding to be discussed, use "bridge sentences" that relate the result to the interpretation. During writing process of the manuscript one of these can be selected based on the intensity of the discussion.
This period of time is adequate for completion of a manuscript within a few weeks which can be generally considered as a long time interval.
based on 82 review